|
A Christmas party for
your employees and their spouses. Seems innocent enough, right? But, at the
party "grab bag" gifts are exchanged. An employee receives a sexually
inappropriate gift that was put into the "grab bag" by one of the
spouses. The next day the employee approaches you and complains about the
gift.
Could you be held responsible
if the employee wants to file a sexual harassment charge?
Yes, according to Darlene
Orlov, president of Orlov Resources Management, Inc., a 20-year-old training
and human resources management consulting firm. Orlov is also the co-author
of a new book, What Every Manager Needs To Know About Sexual Harassment.
"The employer has
a responsibility to protect his or her employees from unwanted sexual communication
or advances from anyone that they would meet in the course of doing business,"
says Orlov.
This responsibility extends
even to company parties, business trips, or any other company function.
"If the employee
got a gift of a sexual nature from the spouse of another employee, even though
that other individual is not employed, it becomes the employer's responsibility
to protect the employee," states Orlov.
This is one of the many
reasons why Orlov recommends all companies, regardless of size, implement
a comprehensive sexual harassment training program. From the delivery person
to the president of the company.
"Not only is it the
legal thing to do," says Orlov, "it is the right thing to do. Because
any employer can be held liable. You cannot escape liability because you think
everyone likes it or because no one has complained."
The key thing that an
employer wants is a workplace where people feel comfortable.
"Defense (against
sexual harassment) is really a policy. Training people, even if it's only
a one-hour training program. They need to be made aware," explains Orlov.
Twenty years ago, if a
waitress was ogled by a customer, she was expected to "put up with it."
"Now it is an awareness thing," says Orlov. "People used to
endure things that made them uncomfortable. Now they are saying 'Gee, I don't
have to do that'."
There are also economic
reasons for having a sexual harassment policy. We all read about the cases
of sexual harassment that go to court. What we don't read about are all of
the claims that are settled out of court. Orlov says that they are very large.
The pre-litigation cost, the depositions are enormous.
Employees also need the
policy as a guide...what to do if there is an incident of sexual harassment.
Orlov states that "one
of the things a plaintiff's lawyer would ask is, 'Did you tell anyone where
you work (about the sexual harassment)? If the answer is 'Oh, they don't care'
or 'My boss participates in it,' then there are no means for that employee
to get it addressed internally." Employers need to have the steps for
reporting an incident clearly stated in the sexual harassment policy.
Another preventative for
sexual harassment is the "zero-tolerance" policy. Orlov explains:
"Zero-tolerance is an environment where you don't permit the kind of
inappropriate comments and behaviors that kind of 'lead up' to unlawful behaviors.
The theory is that if you don't allow people to be abusive and obnoxious to
each other...tell dirty jokes and say things of that nature...then the conversation
will never rise to the level where it is actually sexual harassment."
"According to the
law, sexual harassment at the workplace involves things of a sexual nature
that are severe and pervasive. One joke in not sexual harassment. At some
point it becomes intolerable. What organizations are saying is, 'We're not
going to tolerate one. We're not going to tolerate one calendar, one joke,
one comment. Because we know that sets the tone for problems,'" says
Orlov.
How does an employer protect
employees from becoming victims of sexual harassment?
1. Empower people to speak
up...train them how to speak up if there is a problem. Because it can be resolved
on the spot if someone just basically says "Quit doing that" and
the person listens, gets it and stops.
2. Give the employee someone
to report it to if they are not comfortable addressing it on their own.
To protect an employee
from an accusation of sexual harassment, Orlov recommends employers "guide
them in preventing the behaviors that could lead to a problem."
Another problem becoming
prevalent is that of retaliation charges being brought against employers even
when a sexual harassment claim is later proven to be without merit.
Orlov clarifies: "Someone
brings a charge of sexual harassment and the charge was disaproved...no sexual
harassment was found. But, the company is found guilty of retaliation. What
happens is that even if sexual harassment did not occur, the fact that someone
was bothered by the behavior of another person could cause a manager to take
some type of retaliatory action. For example: Let's assume someone is not
a good performer, now they bring a claim of sexual harassment. Now the manager
says, 'Well, they're not performing up to standard, they're not coming to
work on time. I'm going to start writing them up.' The manager does this after
the sexual harassment claim so it naturally looks like retaliation for a sexual
harassment claim. Even though there may not have been sexual harassment of
the behavior did not rise to the level of being unlawful. The company is still
responsible for actions of someone who deliberately tried to retaliate against
someone who brought a claim."
Hostile work environment...does
this mean employees assaulting other employees? It is not quite that drastic.
Orlov says, "A hostile work environment is one in which things of a sexual
nature rise to a level of interfering with someone's ability to do their job."
This is where the zero-tolerate policy comes in...making sure that everyone
knows that you do not tolerate anything of a sexual nature in the workplace.
Orlov explains that sexual
harassment and sexual discrimination are not the same thing. "Sexual
harassment is discrimination based on gender. Someone not given an opportunity
because they are a woman or because they are a man. Sexual harassment if a
form of sexual discrimination. It relates specifically to things of a sexual
nature."
If an employee comes to
you can complains that coworkers are using rude and offensive names for
another coworker, should you be worried about a sexual harassment claim?
According to Orlov, technically, no. "Calling someone stupid or saying
they're incompetent is not sexual harassment, perse. But if an employer
permits that kind of disrespectful, abusive environment, then it's a short
distance from calling someone stupid to calling them a name that may be
derogatory and gender-related."
Top
of page |